top of page

Worries grow about homelessness rise

We all agree on the need Britain’s Housing Benefit system, but there are serious worries that the way the government is approaching the question risks huge new costs of homelessness. This week the British Property Federation released a survey of its members showing;

More than 85% (85.6%) of landlords would not reduce rents to retain existing housing benefit tenants and that almost half (43.4%) planned to reduce the number of properties let to claimants against just 8.3% who planned an increase.

That means there’s a serious risk that homelessness could rise. Here’s the BPF’s release; BRITISH PROPERTY FEDERATION PRESS RELEASE – EMBARGOED 11.00am Wednesday 2 February Ministers urged to support better landlords as survey reveals looming housing crisis Ministers have been urged to avoid a looming housing benefit crisis after new research revealed that welfare cuts may spark an exodus of better landlords from the housing benefit sector. Data launched at the British Property Federation’s Residential Conference this morning showed that almost nine in ten landlords (88.3%) would not reduce their rents to claimants, despite the raft of cuts to the housing benefit received by tenants announced by the government. This flies in the face of government’s key argument in favour of the changes – that landlords would reduce their rents in line with housing benefit cuts – and suggests that the high demand for homes in many areas will simply prompt landlords to instead let their properties to paying tenants. The survey found that more than 85% (85.6%) of landlords would not reduce rents to retain existing housing benefit tenants and that almost half (43.4%) planned to reduce the number of properties let to claimants against just 8.3% who planned an increase. The British Property Federation said that one measure that could keep landlords in the housing benefit market is a return to direct payment, where a tenant could request their housing benefit is paid directly to the landlord. Since the removal of direct payment in 2008 tenants have failed to pass on millions of pounds in rent, prompting more and more landlords to consider leaving the sector, and contributing to 11.7% (£276m) of all UK rent going unpaid in December. The BPF argues that if social landlords faced the same income shortfall they would face significant difficulties. The figures underline fears articulated by politicians including London mayor Boris Johnson that the cuts would force many households claiming housing benefit to move from their homes – and possibly their jobs – into small pockets of poor-quality housing. Landlord groups and homeless charities have asked government to reconsider the damaging cuts, and in particular, to stop housing benefit money that should be spent on rent from leaking out of the system. The British Property Federation supports reform of the housing benefit system, but believes current proposals will increase tenant indebtedness – and the resultant burden on landlords and taxpayers. Ian Fletcher, Director of Policy for the British Property Federation, said: “Most landlords want to ensure that tenants on benefits remain housed, but with housing benefit rates being cut and little restoration of rents being paid direct to landlords, our figures bear out that many respectable landlords look set to exit the benefit market. Such an exodus would be a tragedy, with more and more claimants forced into a few concentrated areas of sub-standard accommodation. Government should be seeking to work with the private rented sector to stop this happening. “Paying your way in the world is one of the values t shat goes to the heart of this coalition Government, yet when it comes to landlords the Government seems prepared to let people on housing benefit get away with living in accommodation rent-free and landlords suffering huge debts. Landlords and taxpayers deserve better than hundreds of millions of lost money each year, which should be being paid out on housing.” Alan Ward, chairman, Residential Landlords Association, commented: “It is clear that many LHA landlords are still intending to reduce their properties in this sector, about which the RLA has warned for over a year. The fundamental problem of direct payment must be resolved quickly, without a rent reduction. However, if the Minister considers it politically expedient, this research shows that it should be limited to a maximum of five percent to minimize the impact in a sector where margins are particularly under pressure”. The BPF Residential Conference will today hear from Welfare Reform Minister, Lord (David) Freud, who will speak for the first time to a landlord/investor audience since the emergency budget last year. Also addressing the conference is:

  • Barry Naisbitt, the Chief Economist at Santander discussing the state of the housing market and prospects for 2011.

  • Leading Chief Executives in the social housing sector on how the Government’s social housing reforms will affect them and the wider investment sector.

  • The leader of Kent County Council, Paul Carter, giving his views on localism.

  • Mark Clare of Barratt and Chris Tinker of Crest Nicholson, two leading figures in the house building sector, on their company’s strategies in the current challenging marketplace for new homes.

ENDs For more information or to organise an interview please contact: Patrick Clift, Media and Public Affairs Manager, the British Property Federation, on 020 7802 0128 / 07834 439 505, or pclift@bpf.org.uk Paul Sweeney, Media Assistant, British Property Federation, on 020 7802 0113 / 07841 732 194 or psweeney@bpf.org.uk Notes to editors: 1) The survey of 1,303 landlords was carried out by the British Property Federation with the Residential Landlords Association. Even amongst those landlords who would accept reduced rents in return for direct payment, over three quarters would only accept a 5% reduction (1) Would you lower rent in return for direct payment of LHA? Yes - 32.4% No - 54.2% Don’t Know - 13.4% % (2) If you would accept reduced rent for direct payment of LHA, how much less per week would you be prepared to accept? Up to 5% - 75.1% 6-10% - 22.6% 11-20% - 1.5% 21% or more - 0.9% 2) The British Property Federation’s Annual Residential Conference takes place at The Willis Building, Lime Street, on 2nd February 9.30am to 4.30pm. 3) The primary reforms to housing benefit set out in the emergency budget and comprehensive spending review all affect private landlords, they include:

  • A reduction in the rent set for local housing allowance (LHA) purposes, from the median rent in an area to 30th centile.

  • A maximum rent for LHA of £400 pw, which will mainly affect London.

  • Restricting the maximum benefit entitlement to the 4-bedroom rate, from April 2011.

  • A proposal from 2013 to link future rises in the LHA to the consumer price index, rather than current link to market data.

  • A proposal from 2013 to cut the housing benefit of recipients of job seekers’ allowance from 100% to 90% after one year of receiving LHA.

  • A policy of only allowing single people to claim the LHA rate for a room, rather than self-contained accommodation for those under 35 years old. At present the age range is only those under 25 years old.

The changes coming into effect in 2013 will shortly be introduced to Parliament via a Welfare Reform Bill, and pave the way towards a system of Universal Credit. 4) The LSL December Buy to Let Index last month showed that unpaid rent owed to residential landlords totalled £276mn across the UK in December, the highest total since December 2009. The proportion of all UK rent that was unpaid or late by the end of December rose from 9.7% in November. The data shows private rented sector rents increased by 3.8% last year.

Commentaires


bottom of page